
Is our art as ethical and impactful as we like to think?
Dakota Cupples, Contributing Writer Can we in good conscience create art that critiques systems of oppression when the same money creating and funding our art comes from the pockets of our oppressors? What are the consequences of making Elon Musk a meme? “Digger,” Alejandro González Iñárritu’s new dark comedy film, is a call for artists to consider whether art is truly an effective way to incite change. The majority of theatre and film is privately funded by investors or wealthy people who perform philanthropy to make themselves look better. Bill Gates has a foundation that gives billions to charity every year, and a portion of that goes to the arts. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, only about roughly 10% of American art was publicly funded, the numbers later being inflated due to COVID-19 relief efforts, according to the National Arts Action Summit. The rest comes from sponsorships, philanthropy or personal income. If you are planning to be a working artist today, chances are you will have to reckon with the fact that the ultra-wealthy are at least part of the reason why you can share your art with others. Many films and TV shows have attempted political satire in recent years















