Skip to content

The Commonwealth Times

Primary Menu

The Commonwealth Times

  • Home
  • News
    • Español
    • Election 2025
  • Sports
    • Men’s Basketball
    • Women’s Basketball
    • Baseball
    • Volleyball
    • Press Box
  • Spectrum
  • Features
  • Opinions
    • Write a Letter to the Editor
  • Humor
  • Comics
  • Special Projects
    • 50th Anniversary
    • The Compass
  • About Us
    • The CT Staff
    • Join Us
    • Subscribe to The CT Newsletter
    • Where To Find A Copy?
    • Advertise with The CT
    • Donate to The Commonwealth Times
  • Home
  • 2015
  • March
  • 23
  • Obama administration is even further from transparency
  • Opinion

Obama administration is even further from transparency

admin March 23, 2015 0

In keeping with court rulings that state the White House Office of Administration is not subject to the Transparency Law, a federal regulation that subjects the office to the Freedom of Information Act was removed on March 17. This will make official a policy under presidents Bush and Obama to reject requests for records to that office.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Morgan White
Opinion Editor

illustration by Erin Bushnell

In keeping with court rulings that state the White House Office of Administration is not subject to the Transparency Law, a federal regulation that subjects the office to the Freedom of Information Act was removed on March 17. This will make official a policy under presidents Bush and Obama to reject requests for records to that office.

The Office of Administration handles record keeping duties such as the archiving of emails. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was part of Obama’s Cabinet, has been in the scope of news as of late for using her own personal private email address and server during the time that she held the position. This clouds the ability to FOIA her emails seeing as they mix in with the personal emails she sends as well.

According to the Associated Press, the Obama administration has set a record censoring government files or outright denying access to them last year under FOIA. When the administration did fulfill FOIA requests it took longer than necessary. The backlog of unanswered questions grew to more than 200,000 by the end of the year. The administration cut 375 employees that were paid to look for records to fulfill requests.

The U.S. spent about $28 million in lawyers’ fees trying to keep records secret. For what Obama attempted to make viewed as the most transparent in U.S. history, his administration has come to be known as one of the least transparent in history. Too often is a press conference held where the best answer White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest or the secretary that preceded him, Jay Carney, can come up with is that the White House just doesn’t know.

In March 2010, the Associated Press found that, under Obama, 17 major agencies were 50 percent more likely to deny FOIA requests than under President George W. Bush. According to an Oct. 2012 Bloomberg article, Eric Holder, attorney general under Obama, has prosecuted more government officials for alleged leaks under the World War I-era Espionage Act than all his predecessors combined.

In contrast, on his first full day in office, President Barack Obama signed the Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government, which called for an unprecedented transparency in government.

The Office of Administration has responded to FOIA requests for 30 years which has only in the past 10 years become politically inconvenient. According to a March 16 USA Today article, late during the Bush administration the White House was sued for deleting nearly 20 million emails. The White House said in a March 17 Federal register that the removing of the FOIA regulations was based on “well-settled legal interpretations.”

The knowledge that the American public deserves is being kept secret and those of power who attempt to share it are viewed as traitors of the state for carrying out a moral responsibility, such as Edward Snowden, and would be arrested and thrown into jail for a lengthy sentence if they were to enter the country again. 

Apparently the preamble of our constitution got lost somewhere in the political strife of the 21st century.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Post navigation

Previous: Previous Post
Next: Pre-employment drug testing is wasteful

More Stories

CT senior collage
  • Opinion

CT seniors say farewell

Opinions Editor December 3, 2025 1
Lauren Smith_Group Doom_ RGB_JPG
  • Opinion

Group projects are driving me insane

Opinions Editor December 3, 2025 1
Screenshot 2025-12-02 at 10.22.30 PM
  • Opinion

You should care about these upcoming SCOTUS decisions

Opinions Editor December 3, 2025 0

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Recent Posts

  • VCU continues provost search, announces second interim provost
  • GRTC toma el siguiente paso hacia su nueva estación de transferencia 
  • Holiday Sweater Party to bring cheer, art and community together
  • New modular curbs continue pedestrian safety efforts
  • Graduating photography students to farewell with One Night Stand

Keep in Touch

  • Instagram
  • X

Reach Out

The CT strives for accuracy. If you believe we have made an error, please contact Executive Editor Andrew Kerley at editor@commonwealthtimes.org.

Letters to the editor or editorial content submissions are encouraged by email to Katie Meeker at opinions@commonwealthtimes.org.

All content © 1968-2025 The Commonwealth Times. No part of The Commonwealth Times may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. All rights reserved.

Get to Know Us

  • About Us
  • The CT Staff
  • Subscribe to The CT Newsletter
Copyright © 2025 The Commonwealth Times | All rights reserved | CoverNews by AF themes.